« Fastnacht Day | Main | Confidence in Scientific Knowledge »

Texas Board of Education in NY Times Magazine

TEA LogoWhen I tell people from outside Texas what a bad board of education we have, I don't think they realize just how bad it is. They seem to think it's the general complaints about governments that everybody has. But the board of education down here really is horrible. I've blogged previously about the science standards (and again, and again), the language arts and reading standards, and the Chris Comer affair.

Now, there's a very good article in the NY Times Magazine describing their shenanigans in regards to the new social studies standards. I highly recommend this article. Here are a few highlights to wet your appetite.

Don McLeroy, a small, vigorous man with a shiny pate and bristling mustache, proposed amendment after amendment on social issues to the document that teams of professional educators had drawn up over 12 months, in what would have to be described as a single-handed display of archconservative political strong-arming.
...some activists decided that the time was right to try to reshape the history that children in public schools study. Succeeding at this would help them toward their ultimate goal of reshaping American society. As Cynthia Dunbar, another Christian activist on the Texas board, put it, “The philosophy of the classroom in one generation will be the philosophy of the government in the next."
McLeroy makes no bones about the fact that his professional qualifications have nothing to do with education. “I’m a dentist, not a historian,” he said. “But I’m fascinated by history, so I’ve read a lot.”

I'm not a doctor, but I stayed at a Holiday Inn last night.

McLeroy remains unbowed and talked cheerfully to me about how, confronted with a statement supporting the validity of evolution that was signed by 800 scientists, he had proudly been able to “stand up to the experts.”
Merely weaving important religious trends and events into the narrative of American history is not what the Christian bloc on the Texas board has pushed for in revising its guidelines. Many of the points that have been incorporated into the guidelines or that have been advanced by board members and their expert advisers slant toward portraying America as having a divinely preordained mission.
when Steven K. Green, director of the Center for Religion, Law and Democracy at Willamette University in Salem, Ore., testified at the board meeting last month in opposition to the board’s approach to bringing religion into history, warning that the Supreme Court has forbidden public schools from “seeking to impress upon students the importance of particular religious values through the curriculum,” and in the process said that the founders “did not draw on Mosaic law, as is mentioned in the standards,” several of the board members seemed dumbstruck.
One recurring theme during the process of revising the social-studies guidelines was the desire of the board to stress the concept of American exceptionalism, and the Christian bloc has repeatedly emphasized that Christianity should be portrayed as the driving force behind what makes America great.
Besides the fact that incorporation by reference [trying to tie the Constitution to the Declaration of Independence] is usually used for technical purposes rather than for such grandiose purposes as the reinterpretation of foundational texts, there is an oddity to this tactic. “The founders deliberately left the word ‘God’ out of the Constitution — but not because they were a bunch of atheists and deists,” says Susan Jacoby, author of “Freethinkers: A History of American Secularism.” “To them, mixing religion and government meant trouble.” The curious thing is that in trying to bring God into the Constitution, the activists — who say their goal is to follow the original intent of the founders — are ignoring the fact that the founders explicitly avoided religious language in that document.
What is wrong with the Texas process, according to many observers, is illustrated by the fate of Bill Martin Jr. The board has the power to accept, reject or rewrite the TEKS, and over the past few years, in language arts, science and now social studies, the members have done all of the above. Yet few of these elected overseers are trained in the fields they are reviewing.
To give an illustration simultaneously of the power of ideology and Texas’ influence, Barber told me that when he led the social-studies division at Prentice Hall, one conservative member of the board told him that the 12th-grade book, “Magruder’s American Government,” would not be approved because it repeatedly referred to the U.S. Constitution as a “living” document. “That book is probably the most famous textbook in American history,” Barber says. “It’s been around since World War I, is updated every year and it had invented the term ‘living Constitution,’ which has been there since the 1950s. But the social conservatives didn’t like its sense of flexibility. They insisted at the last minute that the wording change to ‘enduring.’ ” Prentice Hall agreed to the change, and ever since the book — which Barber estimates controlled 60 or 65 percent of the market nationally — calls it the “enduring Constitution.”

Those quotes are only a taste of the article. Go read the whole thing.

Comments

buy atorvastatin 20mg pill buy lipitor 80mg generic buy generic atorvastatin 40mg

cipro drug - buy generic ethambutol for sale augmentin 1000mg ca

baycip online - baycip tablet order generic augmentin

buy metronidazole tablets - oxytetracycline 250 mg pills generic zithromax 250mg

order ciplox sale - buy erythromycin 500mg generic erythromycin sale

purchase valtrex online - buy cheap generic diltiazem buy zovirax generic

ivermectin 12mg tablets for humans - purchase sumycin online sumycin 500mg sale

oral flagyl 400mg - buy metronidazole tablets buy azithromycin 250mg online cheap

acillin uk ampicillin where to buy purchase amoxicillin sale

furosemide 100mg pill - buy generic atacand 16mg captopril 25mg price

glucophage 1000mg uk - order bactrim 480mg online lincomycin 500mg ca

buy retrovir 300 mg generic - buy generic roxithromycin 150mg purchase zyloprim pill

buy clozapine generic - buy amaryl medication generic famotidine 20mg

seroquel 100mg sale - cheap bupropion without prescription eskalith generic

clomipramine 50mg us - abilify 20mg pill buy doxepin medication

hydroxyzine 10mg drug - buspin online buy purchase endep pills

buy amoxicillin for sale - purchase ceftin for sale buy ciprofloxacin 1000mg online

generic amoxiclav - buy zyvox 600 mg purchase cipro sale

cost cleocin 300mg - order cleocin 300mg without prescription buy chloromycetin without a prescription

zithromax 500mg usa - buy floxin order ciplox 500mg generic

where can i buy stromectol - buy ivermectin 12mg cefaclor sale

albuterol 4mg sale - order promethazine online cheap pill theo-24 Cr 400 mg

desloratadine 5mg us - order flixotide nasal spray order albuterol generic

order depo-medrol online - buy singulair 5mg astelin 10ml uk

order glyburide for sale - pioglitazone 15mg pill buy dapagliflozin no prescription

Post a comment


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.jefflewis.net/blog/jlnet-tb.cgi/289

Archives

Selling Out